Le SCALP et le MM40 Block 3 n’ont pas des statoréacteur.
Si tu connais des missiles AA à carburant liquide je suis preneur ?
Bayern Chemie fait des carburants solides, soit. Mais on avait de l’expérience sur les statoréacteurs.
C’était une coopération et Bayern Chemie n’a pas pondu le Meteor seul.
Matra and DASA's missile division (LFK), were on the brink of a joint bid, which BAe and Alenia were also considering.[18] The Matra/LFK proposal was based on Matra's MICA-Rustique project using a Matra/ONERA designed self-regulating solid fuel ramjet.
Pour le côté politique, la répartition des charges de travail se fait souvent en fonction des financements.
Et effectivement la France a sous-investi dans le Meteor (3ème derrière le Royaule-Unis et l’Allemagne) probablement à cause du développement du Mica.
Mais nous avons quand même fourni la base de l’auto-directeur et le concept du stato:
Matra and DASA's missile division (LFK), were on the brink of a joint bid, which BAe and Alenia were also considering.[18] The Matra/LFK proposal was based on Matra's MICA-Rustique project using a Matra/ONERA designed self-regulating solid fuel ramjet.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteor_(missile)
http://marc.mistral.free.fr/aventure/mi ... h%2012.htm
D’ailleurs ça a été « Dallas » l’histoire du Meteor.
Negotiations to conclude a smart procurement contract continued. At the Paris Air Show 2001 defence ministers from France, Sweden, and the UK signed a Memorandum of Understanding committing their nations to the Meteor programme.[52] The nations of the other industrial partners, Germany, Italy, and Spain, only signalled an intention to sign within a few weeks, claiming procedural delays within their national procurement systems. Following parliamentary approval in August, Italy signed the Memorandum on 26 September 2001, for an anticipated procurement of about 400 missiles.[53] Spain followed on 11 December 2001.
Germany's financial contribution to the programme was considered essential but for more than two years development was hamstrung by the repeated failure of the German defence budget committee to approve funding.[54] Without the German propulsion system, MBDA deemed that Meteor could not realistically proceed. During this gap in the programme MBDA was funding Meteor from its own resources and, by June 2002, had spent around £70m - most of which had gone, ironically, to Bayern-Chemie to reduce technical risk in the propulsion system, the performance of which was critical to meeting the requirements.
Germany had set two conditions for participation in the project: that the UK should place a contract for the weapon; and that MBDA give a guaranteed level of performance, both of which were achieved by 30 April 2002.[55] It was hoped to sign an agreement at that summer's Farnborough Air Show.
However Germany would not approve funding for the project until December 2002, at the same time cutting its planned acquisition from 1,488 to 600 missiles.[56]
Ça ne vous rappelle rien ?
