Recherche As sur Corsair
#51
"mimum fuel consuption" et "maximum cruise" sont sur ta feuille.
Je te joins les paramètres que j'ai, qui ne sont pas exactement les mêmes,mais proches.
croisière éco (recommandé) 80USG/h, 29pouces, 2150rpm
conso mini: 45USG/h 2,9pouces, 1350rpm
edit: je viens de vérifier et le F4U1A a maintenant effectivement 340USG de fuel interne, ça va encore rallonger son autonomie !
Je te joins les paramètres que j'ai, qui ne sont pas exactement les mêmes,mais proches.
croisière éco (recommandé) 80USG/h, 29pouces, 2150rpm
conso mini: 45USG/h 2,9pouces, 1350rpm
edit: je viens de vérifier et le F4U1A a maintenant effectivement 340USG de fuel interne, ça va encore rallonger son autonomie !
L'avion, l'avion, l'avion, ça fait lever les yeux, etc...
#52
je pensais que t'avais d'autres réglages que ceux la,
j'ai révérifier , effectivement avec en plus deux réservoirs internes d'aile, on passe a 360Gal.
je vais tester un peu le "full éco" et la "croisère éco".
j'ai révérifier , effectivement avec en plus deux réservoirs internes d'aile, on passe a 360Gal.
je vais tester un peu le "full éco" et la "croisère éco".
#53
Heu... Je crois bien que le Corsair avait un seul réservoir de 237 USG?
Seul le prototype avait des réservoirs d'aile?
Seul le prototype avait des réservoirs d'aile?
#54
suivant le manuel, il y a bien un principal dans le fuselage et un dans chaque aile, et en version longue distance, on rajoute une nourrice (Bizarre qu'en disant "drop your baby", ce soit en fait la nourrice que l'on largue...)
#55
During the time of test flying, the US Navy recognised the fact that they had falsely believed the USA would not be drawn in another large scale war. As such they needed an advanced aircraft to be able to fight the seemingly unbeatable Nazi-forces. At the same time they capitalized on the experience that was gained the hard way by the British and French forces. Therefor the first production aircraft differed considerably from the XF4U-1. Production aircraft were able to sustain a high-speed dive by removing the fabric on the wings and replacing it with sheet metal. Span and length were each increased slightly, and the armament was revised. The two fuselage-mounted guns and their heavy synchronization system were removed, and the wing-mounted armament was first increased to four and then 6 × 0.5 inch (12,7 mm) fixed forward-firing machine guns with the considerably enlarged ammunition capacity of 400 rounds per gun for the inboard four weapons and 375 rounds per gun for the outboard two weapons. At the same time the two outer-wing bomblet bays were removed. The revision of the wing-mounted armament meant the elimination the integral leading-edge tanks pioneered in the prototype, and to redress the resulting shortfall in fuel capacity the original small center-section tank was replaced by a large 197 Imp gal (237 US gal, 897 liter) self-sealing tank inserted into the fuselage. This tank had to be located as close to the center of gravity as possible, so the cockpit was moved some 3 ft 0 inch (0,91 m) farther to the rear despite the fact that this relocation further worsened the already inadequate forward fields of vision suffered by the pilot during take-off and landing. The Corsair could carry a centerline drop tank of 146 Imp gal (175 US gal, 662 liter) capacity, but the size of the internal fuel capacity provided by the fuselage tank was still considered inadequate, and two 52 Imp gal (62 US gal; 235 liter) unprotected leading-edge tanks were therefore added outboard of the gun bays in a process that raised the maximum take-off weight with internal fuel to 12,694 lb (5.758 kg) in concert with the addition of IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) gear, a bulletproof windscreen, a jettisonable canopy, and 155 lb (70.3 kg) of armor round the cockpit and oil tankage.
These changes increased wing loading by just over 33% from the XF4U-1’s figure of 29.8 lb/sq ft (145,5 kg/m²) to 40.4 lb/sq ft (197,2 kg/m²) and further eroded maneuverability despite the adoption of longer-span ailerons for improved roll response. The negative effect of weight on performance was countered by the adoption of the R-2800-8(B) radial engine rated at 2,000 hp (1.491 kW), and this was installed in a cowling with mechanically rather than hydraulically operated cooling gills in a fuselage lengthened by 1 ft 5 inch (0,43 m) to 33 ft 4 inch (10,16 m) from the XF4U-1’s figure of 31 ft 11 inch (9,73 m), and the pilot’s fields of vision were improved to the rear at least by the adoption of a cutaway headrest and additional transparent panels.
Total fuel 361 US gal (j'avais un chouille moins sur une autre source).
L'avion, l'avion, l'avion, ça fait lever les yeux, etc...
#57
Ben si, Boyington preferait être major que lieutenant quand même.=WOLF-MAV= a écrit :On est pas à 2 gallons prés tous de meme :yes::yes:
CM Asus Z87 Plus - Proco I7 4770K (oc à 4GHz) + Ventirad Noctua Nh-U12A - Ram DDR3 2x8Go G.Skill TridentX 2400C10D - CG Asus Rogue Strix 08G RTX2070 Super - SSD Samsung 870Evo 250 Go et 870Qvo 1To, Crucial 250Go et 2To - - Alim CoolerMaster SilentPro-M 850w - Ecran Iiyama B2712HDS et un double boot Linux Mint + W10 pro pour faire tourner tout ça
-
- Nouvelle Recrue
- Messages : 15
- Inscription : 07 mars 2007
#58
Warof je parlais d'un régime de vol pas d'un régime de phase d'approche d'attero sinon pour le reste je suis d'accord
#59
50H-Solo a écrit :Ben si, Boyington preferait être major que lieutenant quand même.
:beta::beta:
615sqn_Volta
#60
Euuhhh moi aussi je parlais d'un régime de:sad: vol ...bon, ça y est, je sais plus où j'en suis avec tout ces chiffresVF17_Gunter a écrit :Warof je parlais d'un régime de vol pas d'un régime de phase d'approche d'attero sinon pour le reste je suis d'accord