Particulary the FFW10moi1000 a écrit :this is probably THE question that everybody want to ask here :laugh:
One question.. Is LP releasing a tutorial about aircrafts and objects skins making on AF ??? (sorry, but i can't translate correctly).
Particulary the FFW10moi1000 a écrit :this is probably THE question that everybody want to ask here :laugh:
If I have a choice to don ....between IAF and New FAC upgrade...
We really apreciate your talented french usage and thank you for all your efforts .C3PO a écrit :Ce sera une grande patch -- et je suis beaucoup regardant en avant à son relâchement
Hello ... yes it's an interesting idea the Mirage ... the only problem is modelling accurately the avionics etc...eutoposWildcat a écrit :To add to Electro's question:
The French community has worked a lot to develop many items (complete 2D and 3D models, specific flight models by far superiour to default flight models, weapons) to get nice flyable Mirage 2000 in previous Falcon 4.0 versions, and many French virtual pilots would be really delighted to be able to get these items in Falcon 4.0 Allied Force too.
No, it's not a weird idea to consider an SDK. The problem is that to create a SDK requires considerable resources. While we're committed to supporting Allied Force for the near term, at the least, our primary focus is on our next product release. And I'd like to quash the belief here that skins do not add to instability. Skins CAN add to instability, as we found only a few weeks ago with something we were testing. Our primary focus is stability and because of that, plus the resources required for an SDK, things have to be sacrificed. We're not Microsoft.RooKie78 a écrit :Actually the frustration comes from the "closed" architecture of Allied Force. I understand the stability moto, but I figured out that Lead Pursuit would improve AF's ability to load external resources like Skin, and models, textures, F16 Pit (eg non intrusive stuff).
As for non F16 pit I understand the problem since it is tigthly link to the code. But is it a weird idea to consider to release a kind of SDK ?... No doubt this would attract more customers and please the existing one...
LOLC3PO a écrit :No, it's not a weird idea to consider an SDK. The problem is that to create a SDK requires considerable resources. While we're committed to supporting Allied Force for the near term, at the least, our primary focus is on our next product release. And I'd like to quash the belief here that skins do not add to instability. Skins CAN add to instability, as we found only a few weeks ago with something we were testing. Our primary focus is stability and because of that, plus the resources required for an SDK, things have to be sacrificed. We're not Microsoft.
Here's the polite reply: our resources are much better placed in product developmentWild Angel a écrit :LOL
Do you realy work in computers or are you a lost director of comm?
Go on saying such ineptitudes and they won't be a lot.C3PO a écrit :I'll assume others here are happy for me to contribute more here
Very soon I'll be publishing a full changelog for the upcoming patch. Of course, visual treats are only a small part of these changes.
Edit de fuchs, la prochaine fois, tu prends des vacances!!!!!!
y a des MP pour ca!
roger?
La journée que tu écriras une simulation comme eux le font, je t'appuierai. Pour l'instant, le travail qu'il font est incroyable. Tu agis comme un enfant de 2 ans et ca me frustre si tu veux savoir. Gros bébé gaté qui ne sait rien faire.Wild Angel a écrit :J'agresse sans raisons?
=> les skins ne sont pas partie des données échangées online, elles restent perso à l'ordi.
Les skins de fumées et d'explosions sont aussi des skins: pourquoi celà serait il différent dans un cas et pas dans l'autre?
Honnêtement, vous faites ce que vous voulez, mais moi, voire un mec qui annonce de pseudo-super nouvelles en disant des conneries qui ont été balayées depuis les versions 1.08us, ça me débecte.
Après vous croyez qui vous voulez, mais quelqu'un sensé être responsable du développement d'un "simu" qui sort des trucs pareil, il faudrait vous poser des questions, d'autant que certains d'entre vous connaissent falcon4 "old", vous suivez les développements depuis très longtemps, et vous ne réagissez pas.
Il serait peut-être temps de vous réveiller les mecs, si les skins causaient des pbs en ligne, vous croyez qu'il serait envisageable de tenir un mirroir comme je l'ai fait avec famas?
Sur ce, je vous laisse à refaire l'histoire de falcon et de ses développement, je retourne à mes antiquités.