Publié : ven. mai 28, 2004 6:30 am
je vous livre ce que je trouve ...
même si c'est un peu technique ...certains trouveront peut-être de quoi aider les autres.
A savoir que l'option -MTU derrière le raccourci ne fait pas forcemenent l'unanimité par tous.
Que faut-il en penser ?
Re: OK...so how's MP now with BMS 2.0 Gents?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDog_2
Server mode still pretty touchy. -MTU tests have been unsuccessful and we stopped trying them. Host/client method with multiple clients working well so far.
Very little warp, if any that I recall.
Flying FF2.1/BMS2.0.
Perhaps the following will help with any future evaluation of possible Optimum MTU values for Falcon UDP data transfers:
![Image](http://home.ptd.net/~bhale/Stuff/InfoforMTU.jpg)
Looks like the default of 500 is a winner... being the best balance of throughput vs response time...
__________________
même si c'est un peu technique ...certains trouveront peut-être de quoi aider les autres.
A savoir que l'option -MTU derrière le raccourci ne fait pas forcemenent l'unanimité par tous.
Que faut-il en penser ?
Re: OK...so how's MP now with BMS 2.0 Gents?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDog_2
Server mode still pretty touchy. -MTU tests have been unsuccessful and we stopped trying them. Host/client method with multiple clients working well so far.
Very little warp, if any that I recall.
Flying FF2.1/BMS2.0.
Perhaps the following will help with any future evaluation of possible Optimum MTU values for Falcon UDP data transfers:
![Image](http://home.ptd.net/~bhale/Stuff/InfoforMTU.jpg)
Looks like the default of 500 is a winner... being the best balance of throughput vs response time...
__________________